cliff

It appears it is just the way the program sorts the data. It doesn't distinguish between upper and lower case. But 22A is a different stamp and it displays properly when selected. Cliff

Yes I also looked at folder 385 and all of the images are just Armenia. The problem shows up when I use the "Add Stamp" feature. The images and descriptions that show up are as what I described for Armenia. Cliff

Sure, Armenia # 3-8, 12, 12a 16, 17 19a,19b,19c, 21-26 28-30,35,40a,41a,42a,49-60, 80-84, 86-89, etc. etc. It goes on like that well into the high hundreds( the last one I found was #1000). They are pretty easy to find since the stamp images are Bermuda, the values are pence or schilling and the description sometimes includes queen Victoria or King George or Bermuda. Cliff

When using the add stamp dialog for Armenia stamps I noticed quite a number of Bermuda stamps listed in place of what should be Armenia stamps. The Armenia stamp image file is OK but somehow the add stamp function grabs a bunch of Bermuda stamp images and data. It appears that the Bermuda stamps and data are added in the spaces where there are missing images for Armenia. Has my file system been corrupted somehow? Cliff

Would it be also be possible to separate the different China Treaty Ports into their own categories? The numbering system in Scotts Classic Specialized catalog has a unique numbering system for each port. The stamp pictures get mixed up in Stampmanage. I have a few stamps in those areas and I needed to put subscripts on the stamp numbers so there won't be a conflict. I have a suggested list below: China Treaty Ports- Amoy (1895-1897) China Treaty Ports- Chefoo (1893-1897) China Treaty Ports- Chinkiang (1894-1897 China Treaty Ports- Chungking (1893-1897) China Treaty Ports- Foochow (1895-1897) China Treaty Ports- Hankow (1893-1897) China Treaty Ports- Ichang (1894-1897) China Treaty Ports- Kewkiang (1894-1897) China Treaty Ports- Nanking (1896-1897) China Treaty Ports- Wei Hai Wei (1898-1899) China Treaty Ports- Wuhu (1894-1897) Thanks Cliff

In order for it to be a Scott 362 it must be perf. 12. It does not look like a perf. 12. Based on the date it would more likely be a Scott 506, perf 11. If it is perf. 10 there are a couple of other possibilities. The color darkening is most likely due to oxidation. Cliff

Just type in TAB. The program will save it and 'TAB' will show up on the drop down list the next time you use it. Cliff

Yes, FWT8 exists in the Canada database under War tax stamps. There is no picture but you can add your picture to the database. Cliff

Dr Gary. Scott#656 is a vertical coil, Perf 10. Cliff

Ray, the APU (Ashton-Potter (USA)) coil stamp with the USPS microprint in the bottom white stripe of the flag is Scott # 4854. The SSP (Sennet Security Products) coil stamp with the USPS microprint above the flagpole is Scott # 4868. The SSP stamp without the microprint is a booklet stamp Scott #4869. All of these stamps are listed in Stampmanage but the photos may not show the microprint. Cliff

Just curious if you had a chance to develop a report of all stamps without images. Thanks Cliff

Is it possible to produce a report for my collections of All Stamps WITHOUT images. I can then get a quick list by country and Scott number of the missing Stampmanage images for my collection. I will then scan and upload the images from my collection to the Stampmanage database. It take a long time to sort through each collection and write down the Scott number for each country. It would be a lot easier to just print out a report. Thanks Cliff

Thanks, that took care of the problem. Any idea when the free update will be posted? Cliff

I updated my SM Deluxe 2014 to 2016. I noticed that several of the stamp images for Bolivia are not correct. Looking at the Stamp Data Manager for Bolivia it looks like random country images are displayed for 90% of the stamps. There is a similar problem with Angola. It looks like half of the stamp images are from Botswana. Did something get corrupted during the update?